• initial import of riscv support

    From Rob Swindell@VERT to GitLab note in main/sbbs on Mon Oct 20 20:43:56 2025
    https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/merge_requests/583#note_7753

    I’d be fine merging this, but it needs a successful current pipeline run.

    ---
    ï¿­ Synchronet ï¿­ Vertrauen ï¿­ Home of Synchronet ï¿­ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From ct@VERT to GitLab note in main/sbbs on Fri Nov 7 13:51:17 2025
    https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/merge_requests/583#note_7837

    @rswindell thanks for accepting the submission; I was out of pocket there for a couple weeks - life stuff. Is there anything else that needed to be done or something I should keep in mind for the future?

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From ct@VERT to GitLab note in main/sbbs on Fri Nov 7 13:52:00 2025
    https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/merge_requests/583#note_7837

    @rswindell @Deuce thanks for accepting the submission; I was out of pocket there for a couple weeks - life stuff. Is there anything else that needed to be done or something I should keep in mind for the future?

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From ct@VERT to GitLab note in main/sbbs on Fri Nov 7 13:52:47 2025
    https://gitlab.synchro.net/main/sbbs/-/merge_requests/583#note_7837

    @rswindell @Deuce thanks for accepting the submission; I was out of pocket there for a couple weeks - life stuff. Is there anything else that needed to be done or something I should keep in mind for the future? I'm working on something a little more substantial as a contribution.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Deuce@VERT/BBSDEV to ct on Sat Nov 8 04:32:46 2025
    Re: initial import of riscv support
    By: ct to GitLab note in main/sbbs on Fri Nov 07 2025 01:52 pm

    @rswindell @Deuce thanks for accepting the submission; I was out of pocket there for a couple weeks - life stuff. Is there anything else that needed to be done or something I should keep in mind for the future? I'm working on something a little more substantial as a contribution.

    Nah, you just did the merge request when the CI was failing, so I just needed to rebase it so CI would pass.

    The only reason it took so long is were were waiting for you to do the rebase... once I got tired of waiting, I just pushed a couple buttons and it was good. :D

    If you're actually getting Synchronet running on RISC-V, but keeping it private, it would be good to give Digital Man access... he is most sentitive to how Synchronet is supposed to work, so he'll notice things most people wouldn't.

    If you port Synchronet to RISC-V *and* have one sitting around that can take a reasonable load, it would be good to have gitlab-runner running on it and having it be part of the CI pipeline, but that's a big ask from what hardware is out there right now.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The future of BBSing